Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
* Corresponding author
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Article Main Content

In West Malaysia, solicitors are regulated under the Legal Profession Act 1976 (LPA). Pertaining to holding clients' money to perform the clients' instructions, the LPA empowers the Bar Council to enact rules under Section 78. Pursuant to the said power, Solicitors Account Rules 1990 (SAR) is enacted to regulate the the management and maintenance of clients' money hold by solicitors. However, SAR only provides a minimum rule on maintaining clients' money with no fund security and primarily based on trust and confidence in the solicitor's profession. Due to this fact, mismanagement and misappropriation of client's monies are expected, which some resulted in the solicitors charged for criminal breach of trust of clients' money under the Penal Code (Act 574). Nevertheless, no criminal action against a legal firm that misappropriated the client's money as a legal firm is not a legal entity under criminal law. This paper examines the legal firm's compliance in managing the client's money under the SAR. The paper employs a doctrinal method and applies a content analysis approach. The research concludes that there is in dire need of the monitoring compliance mechanism for the protection of clients’ money as adopted by other jurisdictions. This paper proposes an amendment to SAR, which incorporates the due diligence process to maintain the client's money and penalty provisions to ensure that solicitors compensate for any misappropriation of clients’ money.

References

  1. Arnold, B. L., & Hagan, J. (1992). Careers of misconduct: The structure of prosecuted professional deviance among lawyers. American Sociological Review, 771–780.
     Google Scholar
  2. Baron, P. D., & Corbin, L. C. (2016). Ethics begin at home. Legal Ethics, 19(2), 281–293.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, F. (2017). Making lawyers pay for malpractice in court: skirting advocates' immunity in Australia. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 24(2), 109–123.
     Google Scholar
  4. Choong Yik Son v Majlis Peguam Malaysia, (2008).
     Google Scholar
  5. De Silva, K. (2015). Professional Ethics for Lawyers.
     Google Scholar
  6. Gutteridge, H. C. (1971). Comparative law: an introduction to the comparative method of legal study and research (Vol. 1). CUP Archive.
     Google Scholar
  7. Hamin, Z., Kamaruddin, S., Othman, M.B. (2017) Compliance with customer due diligence under the AML regime: Some evidence from Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 23 (8), pp. 7977-7980.
     Google Scholar
  8. Helgesson, K.S., Mörth, U. (2018). Client Privilege, compliance and the rule of law: swedish lawyers and money laundering prevention. Crime, Law and Social Change, 69 (2), pp. 227-248.
     Google Scholar
  9. Hong Kong Cap. 159F Solicitors' Accounts Rules, (2019). https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap159F.
     Google Scholar
  10. Iacovino, L. (2002). Ethical principles and information professionals: theory, practice and education. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 33(2), 57–74.
     Google Scholar
  11. Jo Timbuong. (2019). Cops looking for 21 lawyers over RM30.4mil in CBT cases. The STAR. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/10/03/cops-looking-for-21-lawyers-over-rm304mil-in-cbt-cases
     Google Scholar
  12. K Vibhute and F Aynalem. (2009). Legal Research Methods: Teaching Material. https://chilot.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/legal-research-methods.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kamaruddin, S., Hamin, Z. (2019). Lawyers' predicaments in complying with the anti-money laundering law in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime, 26 (2), 583–596.
     Google Scholar
  14. Lukito, A.S. (2019). Strengthening the role of lawyers and other professional advisers in addressing economic and financial crimes in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 26 (4), pp. 1107–1116.
     Google Scholar
  15. Law Society of Hong Kong Manual on Solicitors' Accounting, (2016).
     Google Scholar
  16. Majlis Peguam Malaysia v Lim Yin Yin, (2003).
     Google Scholar
  17. Sanusi.M. Z et al. (2015). Fraud Schemes in the Banking Institutions: Prevention Measures to Avoid Severe Financial Loss. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28 (2015) 107–113),.
     Google Scholar
  18. Mohd Shah, R. (2013). Client's Money: Ethical Legal Consideration in Misappropriation and Criminal Breach of Trust. 5th International Conference on Financial Criminology' Global Trends in Financial Crimes in The New Economies. 28–29 May 2013, Holiday Inn Glenmarie, Shah Alam.
     Google Scholar
  19. Narayan, R. D., Dhaliwal, G., Lutz, M., & Hagerty, C. (2019). Professional Misconduct Among Lawyers: A Study On Canadian Lawyers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought.
     Google Scholar
  20. Yassin. M.N. (2004). The Impact of Money Laundering Legislation on Advocates and Solicitors. INSAF, XXXIII, 1, 47-57.
     Google Scholar
  21. Piquero, N. L., Meitl, M. B., Brank, E. M., Woolard, J. L., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Exploring lawyer misconduct: An examination of the self-regulation process. Deviant Behavior, 37(5), 573–584.
     Google Scholar
  22. Solicitors' Account Rules 1990, (2017).
     Google Scholar
  23. SRA Accounts Rules 2011, (2014). www.sra.org.uk.
     Google Scholar
  24. Soule, G. D. (1976). Attorney Misappropriation of Clients' Funds: A Study in Professional Responsibility. U. Mich. JL Reform, 10, 415.
     Google Scholar