BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences- Research Institute, India
* Corresponding author
BGS-Global Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Institute of Biosciences and Technology, MGM University, India
BGS-Global Institute of Medical Sciences, India

Article Main Content

The interplay between cancer cells and fibroblasts, facilitated by the extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN), plays a pivotal role in the invasion of cancer cells. The interaction between CD73 on fibroblasts and EMMPRIN on cancer cells is critical for the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). EMMPRIN is an essential protein that activates the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), which subsequently governs signaling pathways related to cancer cell invasion, migration, angiogenesis, and metastasis, thereby contributing to the advancement of various cancers. EMMPRIN affects MMP production through direct cell-to-cell interactions and its influence on fibroblasts due to their close contact. It is proposed that disrupting the EMMPRIN-CD73 interaction and utilizing an antagonist for both EMMPRIN and VEGFR-2 may significantly impede cancer metastasis. This review aims to investigate how EMMPRIN regulates MMPs and VEGF in the context of cancer metastasis.

Introduction

Metastasis refers to the process through which cancer cells detach from the primary tumor and migrate to other areas of the body, forming secondary tumors. This complex process encompasses several stages, including separation, movement, encroachment, and attachment. Cancer cells escape their initial site, navigate through the bloodstream and lymphatic system, endure the pressures within blood vessels, and acclimate to new environments across the body. Timely detection and prompt treatment can significantly reduce the likelihood of solid tumors spreading, thereby improving their manageability. Metastasis represents a major contributor to mortality in patients with advanced cancer and plays a significant role in increasing illness and death rates [1]–[3].

EMMPRIN, commonly referred to as CD147, is a transmembrane glycoprotein extensively found in human cells and plays an essential part in various physiological functions [4], [5]. Studies conducted by Stenzinger et al. [6] and Chu et al. [7] have recognized EMMPRIN as a critical element in the advancement and spread of cancer. It is known to be overexpressed in multiple tumor types [8], with increased levels detected in metastatic cells [9]–[11] and in the serum of breast cancer patients with lymph node involvement [12]. EMMPRIN is primarily recognized for its angiogenic function, as it promotes the induction of VEGF and MMPs through homophilic interactions between tumor cells and the surrounding stromal cells, particularly fibroblasts. Recent studies have pinpointed a specific short epitope within EMMPRIN crucial for the activation of both VEGF and MMP-9 [13], highlighting its significance in mediating interactions between tumor cells and fibroblasts, with increased expression noted in cultured cells [14]. Acting as a central hub protein, EMMPRIN interacts with various protein partners to form complexes [15] and plays a role in several biological functions, including: enhancing the secretion MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9 and membrane-type 1-MMP from cancer cells, fibroblasts, and endometrial cells, leading to degradation of the basement membrane and ECM, thus facilitating tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis [16], [17]; stimulating tumor angiogenesis by increasing MMP and VEGF levels in cancer cells and adjacent mesenchymal tissues [18]; contributing to chemoresistance in diverse cancers, potentially through activation of the PI3K and MAPK pathways [19], [20]. In addition, EMMPRIN has been linked to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) due to its role in TGFβ1 signaling [21], [22].

MMPs, a family of metal-dependent endopeptidases, are predominantly produced by stromal cells in solid tumors rather than by the cancer cells themselves. The interaction between tumor cells and stromal cells, mediated by EMMPRIN on tumor cells, partially governs this expression. Fibroblasts in the stroma serve as the primary source of MMP production, playing a central role in remodeling the extracellular matrix (ECM) vital for cancer cell behavior. MMPs significantly contribute to essential processes including angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis [23], [24]. The regulation of MMP production by fibroblasts is influenced by EMMPRIN [25], [26]. Endothelial cells use MMPs to degrade the basement membrane of the original blood vessel and remodel the ECM around newly formed blood vessels. EMMPRIN has been shown to stimulate neighboring stromal cells, both fibroblasts and endothelial cells, to increase their MMP synthesis.

In numerous cancers, there is excessive VEGF production, a potent factor that enhances vascular permeability by binding to tyrosine kinase receptors [27]. EMMPRIN upregulation in tumor cells may enhance VEGF expression, underscoring its potential role in angiogenesis. Research has shown that EMMPRIN is crucial in the metastasis of osteosarcoma, as it regulates the production of MMP-1 and VEGF in both cancer cells and the surrounding stromal cells [28]. EMMPRIN promotes VEGF secretion in fibroblasts and cancer cells via the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and enhances the expression of VEGFR2 through the transcription factor HIF2α [29], [30]. Additionally, EMMPRIN has been identified as a co-receptor for VEGFR2, with interaction through its extracellular domain near the cell membrane being critical for the VEGF-induced activation of VEGFR2. This suggests that overexpression of EMMPRIN in cancer may intensify VEGFR2 activation. Furthermore, EMMPRIN facilitates the release of VEGF by directly prompting the secretion of MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP and has demonstrated the ability to enhance VEGF expression via the Src pathway [31].

Study states that EMMPRIN functions as a scaffold protein, facilitating the organization of various proteins into one or more signaling complexes. These complexes play a critical role in driving cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasiveness, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and cell survival-all essential processes for tumor metastasis. As a result, EMMPRIN is gaining attention as a potential target for therapeutic intervention. Therefore, this review seeks to clarify the role of EMMPRIN in the regulation of important factors involved in cancer metastasis, specifically MMPs and VEGF.

EMMPRIN Regulates MMPs in Cancer Cells

MMPs, a group of proteolytic enzymes, are crucial for the remodeling of the ECM in cancer cells, a process vital for metastasis [32]. MMPs become activated through intricate mechanisms involving interactions between cells and the ECM, as well as interactions among different cell types. A soluble and cell-associated factor known as EMMPRIN stimulates MMP production and features two distinct domain structures: extracellular domains I and II [33], [34]. Domain I is particularly important for MMP regulation [35], and EMMPRIN forms homodimers via extracellular domain I on cell surfaces, which promotes MMPs expression [36]. EMMPRIN fulfils its biological roles by inducing the synthesis of several MMPs while not affecting the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases [37]–[39]. Study on cancer metastasis has shown that EMMPRIN influences MMPs through cell-to-cell interactions [40] or a paracrine mechanism [41], impacting fibroblast cells via close contact. Thus, the induction of MMPs production is, at least in part, mediated by the interactions between tumor cells and stromal cells through EMMPRIN [42], [43]. Peritumor stromal cells play a crucial role in the production of tumor-associated interstitial collagenase (MMP-1), stromelysin-1 (MMP-3), and stromelysin-3 (MMP-11), gelatinase A (MMP-2), and gelatinase B (MMP-9) across various cancer types, including breast, colon, lung, skin, and neck cancers [44]–[46]. Investigation has showed that EMMPRIN prompts fibroblasts to produce MMP-2, MMP-3, and membrane type MMPs (MT-1 MMP, MT-2 MMP), with MT-2 MMP serving as an endogenous activator of MMP-2 [47], [48]. Consequently, EMMPRIN regulates the upstream production of MMPs within the local tumor microenvironment, thereby facilitating tumor invasion and metastasis.

EMMPRIN is mostly expressed in tumor cells and plays a key role in regulating the expression of MMPs, particularly MMP-2 and MMP-9, recognized as the primary inducers of MMPs through both homotypic and heterotypic cell interactions. EMMPRIN activates various signaling pathways, including nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) [49], [50]. These pathways ultimately promote MMPs production by initiating transcriptional processes in the cell nucleus. The NF-κB pathway is vital for controlling the transcription of various molecules, including adhesion proteins, cytokines, and MMPs [51], [52]. Typically, NF-κB is found in the cytoplasm bound to the inhibitory protein I-κB. Cellular stresses can lead to the ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and degradation of I-κB, allowing NF-κB to move to the nucleus, where it binds to specific sites to enhance gene transcription [53]. The MAPK signaling pathway specifically regulates EMMPRIN and MMPs, with EMMPRIN also activating the ERK1/2 pathway, which supports cellular proliferation and invasion [54], [55]. MAPK and ERK1/2 signaling activate the AP-1 transcription factor through nuclear translocation, inducing gene transcription of MMPs. Meanwhile, the JAK-STAT signaling pathway is critical for regulating cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, and maintaining tissue homeostasis [56]. In this pathway, JAK phosphorylates STAT proteins, which then dimerize and move to the nucleus to activate gene transcription. Additionally, both the PI3K/AKT and JNK pathways can stimulate MMPs production [49].

EMMPRIN is involved in ECM breakdown and fibrosis, facilitating ECM degradation by regulating MMP synthesis and promoting myofibroblast differentiation [57]. Angiogenesis relies on ECM degradation, which allows tissue invasion and endothelial cell migration. EMMPRIN significantly contributes to angiogenic processes through MMPs and VEGF [58]. Studies suggest that MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12, and MT1-MMP play crucial roles in modulating the activities of vascular cells and stem/progenitor cells during angiogenesis [59], [60]. The ECM is critical for tumor growth, with MMPs recognized as central drivers of various tumor phenotypes. The expression patterns of MMPs are primarily regulated by interactions between tumor cells and the surrounding stroma via EMMPRIN. Within the tumor microenvironment, increased MMP activity leads to the proteolytic cleavage of membrane-bound EMMPRIN, resulting in the release of soluble EMMPRIN. This soluble form exerts paracrine effects on neighboring and distant stromal cells, further stimulating the production of MMPs and EMMPRIN, thereby promoting tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis [61].

EMMPRIN Interacts with CD73 to Regulate MMPs

CD73 is a cell surface protein anchored by glycosylphosphatidylinositol, which is highly expressed in various human solid tumors, including colorectal, prostate, gastric, breast, ovarian, and squamous cell carcinomas [62]–[69]. Its presence in cancer cells has been validated using multiple tumor models that lack CD73 [70]–[74], and its activity has been linked to cancer cell invasion and metastasis [75]. CD73 also plays a role in cancer cell proliferation by influencing the cell cycle, and key signaling pathways such as EGFR, β-catenin/cyclin-D1, and AKT/ERK [76]–[79]. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that CD73 intrinsic to cancer cells accelerates metastasis by promoting EMT through the PI3K/AKT and RICS/Rho GTPase signaling pathways [80], [81].

The expression of EMMPRIN in tumor cells, along with the expression of CD73 in both tumor cells and fibroblasts, is clearly evident. Notably, CD73 is more prominently expressed in the stromal fibroblasts located near the tumor cells, highlighting a significant tumor-stromal interaction related to CD73 in the stromal cells. CD73 and EMMPRIN form a complex at the adhesion points between tumor cells and neighboring fibroblasts, which plays a role in regulating the production of MMPs by the fibroblasts [82]. This interaction allows for the regulation of cancer cell invasion and metastasis by influencing how cancer cells interact with extracellular matrix (ECM) components. Particularly, the trans-interaction between fibroblast CD73 and tumor EMMPRIN has been identified as crucial, providing new insights into the role of CD73 in EMMPRIN-mediated cancer metastasis.

EMMPRIN is not necessarily found in every invasive tumor, and its presence alone does not account for the regulation of MMP-2 production. Moreover, the invasive mechanisms in tumors lacking EMMPRIN or in tumor tissues where CD73 is absent in the stroma remain unclear. However, tumors that exhibit high levels of EMMPRIN in the tumor cells and elevated CD73 expression in the stroma are generally associated with increased aggression and invasiveness [83]. Recent studies suggest that the interaction between CD73 on fibroblasts and EMMPRIN on tumor cells is crucial for modulating MMP-2 production. When CD73 is inhibited, MMP-2 production is suppressed at the transcriptional level, leading to a reduction in tumor invasion. This inhibition disrupts the complex formation between EMMPRIN and CD73, thereby decreasing MMP-2 production from fibroblasts and inhibiting tumor invasion. In this context, CD73 in fibroblasts acts as a receptor for EMMPRIN, facilitating a complex that boosts MMP-2 production and contributes to increased invasiveness. Nevertheless, this mechanism is not universally applicable; EMMPRIN is not present in all tumors, and tumors that lack CD73 in the stroma may utilize alternative pathways to regulate MMP-2 production and invasion [83].

EMMPRIN, which is present in cancer cells, creates a complex with CD73, which is found in both cancer cells and fibroblasts. This complex then modulates the production of pro-MMPs, leading to the generation of active MMPs from fibroblasts (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. The interaction between EMMPRIN found on tumor cells and CD73 located on fibroblasts.

EMMPRIN Regulates VEGF in Cancer Cells

Cancer cells enhance the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells to promote angiogenesis, a process driven by the VEGF and its receptor tyrosine kinase [84], [85]. Increased levels of VEGF have been identified in various human cancers and are closely linked to tumor progression [86]–[88]. Recently, Tang et al. demonstrated that higher expression of EMMPRIN in MDA-MB231 tumor cells can lead to elevated VEGF production, indicating EMMPRIN’s potential role in tumor angiogenesis and EMMPRIN stimulates VEGF production via the PI3K-Akt pathway, which plays a significant role in neovascularization within cancerous tissues [89]. Additionally, EMMPRIN fosters tumor-stromal interactions and directly affects tumor angiogenesis by promoting VEGF release. It has also been suggested that EMMPRIN expression on tumor cells can initiate the production of hyaluronan [90]. Both pathways may lead to VEGF overexpression, further facilitating angiogenesis and metastasis [91]. EMMPRIN has been shown to promote capillary formation, cell migration, and cell survival through its interaction with VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). Importantly, direct engagement with VEGFR-2 on the cell membrane is essential for the activation of VEGFR-2 by VEGF in melanoma cells, highlighting the intricate mechanism through which EMMPRIN functions [92].

Therapeutic Strategies for Targeting CD147

EMMPRIN involvement in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis has positioned it as a novel target for therapeutic advancements. Drug resistance presents a major challenge in cancer treatment, often leading to therapeutic failure. Developing more effective alternative strategies to combat this issue is crucial. Evidence indicates that CD147 plays a pivotal role in drug resistance. The CD147/CD98hc complex, characterized by a highly glycosylated chain linked to a low glycosylated chain, is overexpressed in human cancer cells [93]. The heightened expression of CD147 contributes to chemotherapeutic resistance against drugs such as BCNU, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Taxol via its interaction with hyaluronan [94] and CD44. Additionally, this interaction enhances receptor tyrosine kinase activity, ABC transporter functionality, and MCTs, facilitating drug efflux and contributing to resistance against cisplatin and methotrexate [95]. The collaboration between CD147 and LYVE1 (Endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 of lymphatic vessels) may regulate chemoresistance in lymphoma by increase in the expression of the drug transporter ABCG2 (protein that resist breast cancer) [96]. Furthermore, CD147 is capable of forming a complex with ABCG2, thereby stabilizing it [97]. These insights suggest that therapies targeting CD147 could offer a viable means of circumventing drug resistance. Targeted therapy strategies focus on reducing EMMPRIN expression through RNA interference (RNAi) [98], small molecule inhibitors [99], monoclonal antibodies [100], and polyclonal antibodies aimed at blocking its function [101]. Licartin, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD147, has been developed and received approval for clinical use [102]. Additionally, the antibody MEM-M6/1, which focuses on the interactions between CD147 and MCT-1, has demonstrated the ability to induce necrosis in colon cancer and melanoma cells [100]. Inhibiting CD147 with a specific polyclonal antibody (161-Ab) can significantly suppress the release of VEGF and MMP-9 in accordance with the dosage, ultimately reducing tumor growth and metastasis [101]. The antibody 059-053, in combination with gemcitabine, decreased survival rates in pancreatic cancer cells [103], while an additional monoclonal antibody targeting CD147 (CNTO3899) was shown to promote apoptosis in head and neck cancer cells by increasing caspase-3 and caspase-8 activity [104]. Several variants of the HAb18 antibody targeting CD147 have been created to manipulate cytoskeletal rearrangement through the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, thereby influencing metastatic spread in hepatocellular carcinoma [105]. In addition, the HcHAb18 antibody, conjugated with a maytansinoid derivative- a cytotoxic agent can effectively target lung cancer [106]. More recently, HAb18 has been demonstrated to sensitize pancreatic cancer cells in response to chemoradiotherapy (Gemcitabine and genfitinib) by inhibiting the STAT pathway [107]. Peptide vaccines targeting EMMPRIN have also been developed [108]. Researchers have identified AC-73, a compact molecule inhibitor of EMMPRIN dimerization, which suppresses MMP-2 synthesis in hepatocellular carcinoma through the CD147-ERK-STAT3-MMP-2 signaling cascade [99]. Furthermore, AC-73 treatment was found to stimulate leukemia cell proliferation by inactivating the ERK-STAT-3 pathway, and chimeric antigen receptor treatment utilizing CD147-CAR-modified immune cells represents a cutting-edge approach in cancer treatment [109]. There is also evidence that AC-73 enhances sensitivity to Chemotherapy with arsenic trioxide and Arabinosylcytosine, allowing for reduced dosages [110]. More recently, Acriflavine, a petite molecule, has been shown to inhibit CD147 and MCT-4 interactions, effectively blocking glioblastoma growth and angiogenesis [111]. The expression of EMMPRIN and MMP-9 correlates with EGFR expression, contributing to cancer progression. Combination therapies targeting EGFR and CD-147 have been found to decrease the proliferation and migration of squamous cell carcinoma cells [112].

Conclusion

EMMPRIN is an essential molecular element that significantly contributes to cancer progression. It is involved in the secretion of various MMPs and mediates the binding of fibroblasts. Importantly, the interaction between CD73 and EMMPRIN on cancer cells is essential for regulating the production of MMPs. The formation of a complex between EMMPRIN and CD73 enhances MMP production, leading to increased degradation of the ECM and promoting the invasion of cancer cells. Additionally, EMMPRIN stimulates the production of VEGF via the PI3K-Akt pathway, which supports tumor angiogenesis by regulating VEGF levels. The overexpression of EMMPRIN in cancer cells results in the activation of VEGFR-2, suggesting that inhibiting the interaction between EMMPRIN and CD73, as well as blocking the EMMPRIN/VEGFR-2 pathway, could have a crucial impact on reducing cancer angiogenesis and metastasis.

Conflict of Interest

Conflict of Interest: The authors affirm that there are no potential conflicts of interest related to the content of this manuscript.

References

  1. Luzzi KJ, Mac IC, Schmidt EE, Kerkvliet N, Morris VL, Chambers AF, et al. Multistep nature of metastatic inefficiency: dormancy of solitary cells after successful extravasation and limited survival of early micrometastases. Am J Pathol. 1998;153(3):865–73.
     Google Scholar
  2. Wells A, Grahovac J, Wheeler S, Ma B, Lauffenburger D. Targeting tumor cell motility as a strategy against invasion and metastasis. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(5):283–9.
     Google Scholar
  3. Seyfried TN, Huysentruyt LC. On the origin of cancer metastasis. Crit Rev Oncog. 2013;18(1–2):43–73.
     Google Scholar
  4. Riethdorf S, Reimers N, Assmann V, Kornfeld JW, Terracciano L, Sauter G, et al. High incidence of EMMPRIN expression in human tumors. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(8):1800–10.
     Google Scholar
  5. Weidle UH, Scheuer W, Eggle D, Klostermann S, Stockinger H. Cancer-related issues of CD147. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2010;7(3):157–69.
     Google Scholar
  6. Stenzinger A, Wittschieber D, Von-Winterfeld M, Goeppert B, Kamphues C, Weichert W, et al. High extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer/CD147 expression is strongly and independently associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:1471–81.
     Google Scholar
  7. Chu D, Zhu S, Li JP, Ji G, Wang W, Wu G. CD147 expression in human gastric cancer is associated with tumor recurrence and prognosis. PloS one. 2014;9(6):e101027.
     Google Scholar
  8. Grass GD, Toole BP. How, with whom and when: an overview of CD147-mediated regulatory networks influencingmatrixmetalloproteinase activity. Biosci Rep. 2016;36(1):e00283.
     Google Scholar
  9. Liu B,Wan Z, Sheng B, LinY, Fu T, ZengQ, et al. Overexpression of EMMPRIN is associated with lymph node metastasis and advanced stage of Non-small cell lung cancer: a Retrospective study. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1):214.
     Google Scholar
  10. Li F, Zhang J, Guo J, Jia Y, Han Y, Wang Z. RNA-interference targeting CD147 inhibits metastasis and invasion of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells by down regulating MMP-9/VEGF expression. Acta Biochimica Biophysica Sinica. 2018;50(7):676–84.
     Google Scholar
  11. Liu N, Qi M, Li K, Zeng W, Li J, YinM, et al. CD147 regulates melanoma metastasis via the NFAT1-MMP-9 pathway. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2020;33(5):731–43.
     Google Scholar
  12. Kuang YH, Liu YJ, Tang LL, Wang SM, Yan GJ, Liao LQ. Plasma soluble cluster of differentiation 147 levels are increased in breast cancer patients and associated with lymph node metastasis and chemoresistance. Hong Kong Med J. 2018;24(3):252–60.
     Google Scholar
  13. Toole BP. Emmprin (CD147), a cell surface regulator of matrix metalloproteinase production and function. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;54:371–89.
     Google Scholar
  14. Grass GD, Dai L, Qin Z, Parsons C, Toole BP. CD147: regulator of Hyaluronan signaling in invasiveness and chemoresistance. Adv Cancer Res. 2014;123:351–73.
     Google Scholar
  15. Grass GD, Tolliver LB, Bratoeva M, Toole BP. CD147, CD44, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway cooperate to regulate breast epithelial cell invasiveness. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(36):26089–104.
     Google Scholar
  16. Huang P, Shi C, Xiaolin J, Juan S, Chao D, Xu L, et al. RNAinterference targeting CD147 inhibits the proliferation, invasiveness, and metastatic activity of thyroid carcinoma cells by down-regulating glycolysis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(1):309–18.
     Google Scholar
  17. Grass GD, Toole BP. How, with whom and when: an overview of CD147-mediated regulatory networks influencingmatrixmetalloproteinase activity. Biosci Rep. 2016;36(1):e00283.
     Google Scholar
  18. Pinheiro C, Eduardo AG, Filipa MS, Marise AR, Fabio MA, Luiz FJ, et al. Reprogramming energy metabolism and inducing angiogenesis: co-expression of monocarboxylate transporters with VEGF family members in cervical adenocarcinomas. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:835.
     Google Scholar
  19. Zeng HZ, Qu YQ, Liang AB, Deng AM, Zhang WJ, Xiu B, et al. Expression of CD147 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer correlated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy resistance. Neoplasma. 2011;58(5):449–54.
     Google Scholar
  20. Hao J, Madigan MC, Khatri A, Power CA, Hung TT, Beretov J, et al. In vitro and in vivo prostate cancer metastasis and chemoresistance can bemodulated by expression of either CD44 or CD147. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e40716.
     Google Scholar
  21. Ru NY, Wu J, Chen ZN, Bian H. HAb18G/ CD147 are involved in TGF-β1 induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and hepatocellular carcinoma invasion. Cell Biol Int. 2015;39(1):44–51.
     Google Scholar
  22. Suzuki S, Toyoma S, Tsuji T, Kawasaki Y, Yamada T. CD147 mediates transforming growth factor-β1 induced epithelialmesenchymal transition and cell invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(4):2855–60.
     Google Scholar
  23. Nelson AR, Fingleton B, Rothenberg ML,Matrisian LM.Matrix metalloproteinases: biologic activity and clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(5):1135–49.
     Google Scholar
  24. Bergers G, Brekken R, McMahon G, Vu TH, Itoh T, Tamaki K, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggers the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(10):737–44.
     Google Scholar
  25. Nabeshima K, Iwasaki H, Koga K, Hojo H, Suzumiya J, Kikuchi M. Emmprin (basigin/CD147): matrix metalloproteinase modulator and multifunctional cell recognition molecule that plays a critical role in cancer progression. Pathol Int. 2006;56(7):359–67.
     Google Scholar
  26. Toole BP. Emmprin (CD147), a cell surface regulator of matrix metalloproteinase production and function. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;54:371–89.
     Google Scholar
  27. Tang Y, Nakada MT, Kesavan P, McCabe F, Millar H, Rafferty P, et al. Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer stimulates tumor angiogenesis by elevating vascular endothelial cell growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3193–9.
     Google Scholar
  28. Han SK, Ha JK, Mi RL, Llkyu H. EMMPRIN expression is associated with metastatic progression in osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1059.
     Google Scholar
  29. Bougatef F, Menashi S, Khayati F, Naimi B, Porcher R, Podgorniak MP, et al. EMMPRIN promotes melanoma cells malignant properties through a HIF2α mediated upregulation of VEGF receptor-2. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12265.
     Google Scholar
  30. Tang Y, Nakada MT, Rafferty P, Laraio J, McCabe FL, Millar H, et al. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by EMMPRIN via the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Mol Cancer Res. 2006;4(6):371–7.
     Google Scholar
  31. Sounni NE, Roghi C, Chabottaux V, Janssen M, Manaut C, Maquoi E, et al. Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor-A by active membrane type1 matrix metalloproteinase through activation of Src-tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(4):13564–74.
     Google Scholar
  32. Stetler Stevenson WG, Aznavoorian S, Liotta LA. Tumor cell interaction with the extracellular matrix during invasion and metastasis. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1993;9:541–73.
     Google Scholar
  33. Miyauchi T, Kanekura T, Yamaoka A, Ozawa M, Miyazawa S, Muramatsu T. Basigin, a new, broadly distributed member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, has strong homology with both the immunoglobulin V domain and the b-chain of major histocompatibility complex class II antigen. J Biochem. 1990;107(2):316–23.
     Google Scholar
  34. Miyauchi T, Masuzawa Y, Muramatsu T. The basigin group of the immunoglobulin superfamily: complete conservation of a segment in and around transmembrane domains of human and mouse basigin and chicken HT7 antigen. J Biochem. 1991;110(5):770–4.
     Google Scholar
  35. Sato T, Ota T, Watanabe M, Imada K, Nomizu M, Ito A. Identification of an active site of EMMPRIN for the augmentation of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -3 expressions in a co-culture of human uterine cervical carcinoma cells and fibroblasts. Gynaecol Oncol. 2009;114(2):337–42.
     Google Scholar
  36. Yoshida S, Shibata M, Yamamoto S, Hagihara M, Asai N, Takahashi M, et al. Homo-oligomer formation by basigin, an immunoglobulin superfamily member, viaits N-terminal immunoglobulin domain. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267(14):4372–80.
     Google Scholar
  37. Caudroy S, Polette M, Nawrocki-Raby B, Cao J, Toole BP, Zucker S, et al. EMMPRIN mediated MMP regulation in tumor and endothelial cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19(8):697–702.
     Google Scholar
  38. Gabison EE, Mourah S, Steinfels E, Yan L, Hoang-Xuan T, Watsky MA, et al. Differential expression of EMMPRIN in normal and ulcerated corneas: role in epithelio-stromal interactions and MMP induction. Am J Pathol. 2005;166(1):209–19.
     Google Scholar
  39. Chen L, Belton RJ, Nowak RA. Basigin-mediated gene expression changes in mouse uterine stromal cells during implantation. Endocrinology. 2009;150(2):966–76.
     Google Scholar
  40. Suzuki S, Sato M, Senoo H, Ishikawa K. Direct cell-cell interaction enhances pro-MMP-2 production and activation in co-culture of laryngeal cancer cells and fibroblasts: involvement of EMMPRIN and MT1-MMP. Exp Cell Res. 2004;293(2):259–66.
     Google Scholar
  41. Sidhu SS, Mengistab AT, Tauscher AN, Lavail J, Basbaum C. The microvesicle as a vehicle for EMMPRIN in tumor-stromal interactions. Oncogene. 2004;23(4):956–63.
     Google Scholar
  42. Guo H, Zucker S, Gordon MK, Toole BP, Biswas C. Stimulation of matrix metalloproteinase production by recombinant extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer from transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(1):24–7.
     Google Scholar
  43. Lim M, Martinez T, Jablons D, Cameron R, Guo H, Toole B, et al. Tumor-derived EMMPRIN (extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer) stimulates collagenase transcription through MAPK p38. FEBS Lett. 1998;441(1):88–92.
     Google Scholar
  44. Basset P, Wolf C, Chambon P. Expression of the stromelysin-3 gene in fibroblastic cells of invasive carcinomas of the breast and other human tissues: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993;24(3):185–93.
     Google Scholar
  45. Majumdar G, Nelson BR, Jensen TC, Voorhees JJ, Johnson TM. Increased expression of stromelysin-3 in basal cell carcinomas. Mol Carcinog. 1994;9(1):17–23.
     Google Scholar
  46. Okada A, Bellocq JP, Rouyer N, Chenard MP, Rio MC, Chambon P, et al. Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase (MT-MMP) gene is expressed in stromal cells of human colon, breast, and head and neck carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(7):2730–4.
     Google Scholar
  47. Kataoka H, DeCastro R, Zucker S, Biswas C. Tumor cell-derived collagenase-stimulatory factor increases expression of interstitial collagenase, stromelysin, and 72-kDa gelatinase. Cancer Res. 1993;53(13):3154–8.
     Google Scholar
  48. Sameshima T, Nabeshima K, Toole BP, Yokogami K, Okada Y, Goya T, et al. Glioma cell extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) (CD147) stimulates production of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases and activated gelatinase A in co-cultures with brain-derived fibroblasts. Cancer Lett. 2000;157(2):177–84.
     Google Scholar
  49. Cheng CY, Hsieh HL, Hsiao LD, Yang CM. PI3K/Akt/JNK/NF-κB is essential for MMP-9 expression and outgrowth in human limbal epithelial cells on intact amniotic membrane. Stem CellRes. 2012;9(1):9–23.
     Google Scholar
  50. Dana P, Kariya R, Lert-Itthiporn W, Seubwai W, Saisomboon S, Wongkham C, et al. Homophilic interaction of CD147 promotes IL-6 mediated cholanagiocarcinoma invasion via the NF-κB dependent pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(24):13496.
     Google Scholar
  51. Bond M, Chase AJ, Baker AH, Newby AC. Inhibition of transcription factor NF-κB reduces matrix metalloproteinase-1,-3 and-9 productions by vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50(3):556–65.
     Google Scholar
  52. Zhang Z, Dong T, Fu Y, Zhou W, Tian X, Chen G, et al. MMP-11 promotes papillary thyroid cell proliferation and invasion via the NF-κB pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(2):1860–8.
     Google Scholar
  53. Abraham E. NF-κB activation. Crit CareMed. 2000;28(4):100–4.
     Google Scholar
  54. Cao J, Han Z, Tian L, Chen K, Fan Y, Ye B, et al. Curcumin inhibits EMMPRIN and MMP-9 expression through AMPKMAPK and PKC signaling in PMA induced macrophages. J Transl Med. 2014;12(2):266.
     Google Scholar
  55. Xin X, Zeng X, Gu H, Li M, Tan H, Jin Z, et al. CD147/EMMPRIN overexpression and prognosis in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32804.
     Google Scholar
  56. Vera J, Rateitschak K, Lange F, Kossow C, Wolkenhauer O, Jaster R. Systems biology of JAK-STAT signaling in human malignancies. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011;106(2):426–34.
     Google Scholar
  57. Guindolet D, Gabison EE. Role of CD147 (EMMPRIN/Basigin) in tissue remodeling. Anat Rec. 2020;303(6):1584–9.
     Google Scholar
  58. Siefert SA, Sarkar R. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular physiology and disease. Vascular. 2012;20(4):210–6.
     Google Scholar
  59. Chen Q, Jin M, Yang F, Zhu J, Xiao Q, Zhang L. Matrix metalloproteinases: inflammatory regulators of cell behaviors in vascular formation and remodelling. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;20(13):928315.
     Google Scholar
  60. Rundhaug JE.Matrix metalloproteinases and angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2005;9(2):267–85.
     Google Scholar
  61. Tang Y, Kesavan P, Nakada MT, Yan L. Tumor-stroma interaction: positive feedback regulation of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) expression and matrix metalloproteinase-dependent generation of soluble EMMPRIN. Mol Cancer Res. 2004;2(2):73–80.
     Google Scholar
  62. Liu N, Fang XD, Vadis Q. CD73 as a novel prognostic biomarker for human colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106(7):918–9.
     Google Scholar
  63. Wu XR, He XS, Chen YF, Yuan RX, Zeng Y, Lian L, et al. High expression of CD73 as a poor prognostic biomarker in human colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106(2):130–7.
     Google Scholar
  64. Yang Q, Du J, Zu L. Overexpression of CD73 in prostate cancer is associated with lymph node metastasis. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19(4):811–4.
     Google Scholar
  65. Lu XX, Chen YT, Feng B, Mao XB, Yu B, Chu XY. Expression and clinical significance of CD73 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(12):1912–8.
     Google Scholar
  66. Loi S, Pommey S, Haibe-Kains B, Beavis PA, Darcy PK, Smyth MJ, et al. CD73 promotes anthracycline resistance and poor prognosis in triple negative breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(27):11091–6.
     Google Scholar
  67. Turcotte M, Spring K, Pommey S, Chouinard G, Cousineau I, George J, et al. CD73 is associated with poor prognosis in highgrade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2015;75(21):4494–503.
     Google Scholar
  68. Leclerc BG, Charlebois R, Chouinard G, Allard B, Pommey S, Saad F, et al. CD73 expression is an independent prognostic factor in prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(1):158–66.
     Google Scholar
  69. Ren ZH, Lin CZ, Cao W, Yang R, Lu W, Liu ZQ, et al. CD73 is associated with poor prognosis in HNSCC. Oncotarget. 2016;7(38):61690–702.
     Google Scholar
  70. Jin D, Fan J, Wang L, Thompson LF, Liu A, Daniel BJ, et al. CD73 on tumor cells impairs antitumor T-cell responses: a novel mechanism of tumor-induced immune suppression. Cancer Res. 2010;70(6):2245–55.
     Google Scholar
  71. Yegutkin GG, Marttila-Ichihara F, Karikoski M, Niemela J, Laurila JP, Elima K, et al. Altered purinergic signaling in CD73-deficient mice inhibits tumor progression. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(5):1231–41.
     Google Scholar
  72. Wang L, Fan J, Thompson LF, Zhang Y, Shin T, Curiel TJ, et al. CD73 has distinct roles in nonhematopoietic and hematopoietic cells to promote tumor growth in mice. J Clin Investig. 2011;121(6):2371–82.
     Google Scholar
  73. Stagg J, Divisekera U, Duret H, Sparwasser T, Teng MW, Darcy PK, et al. CD73-deficient mice have increased antitumor immunity and are resistant to experimental metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71(8):2892–900.
     Google Scholar
  74. Stagg J, Beavis PA, Divisekera U, Liu MC, Moller A, Darcy PK, et al. CD73-deficient mice are resistant to carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2012;72(9):2190–6.
     Google Scholar
  75. Chen S, Wainwright DA, Wu JD, Wan Y, Matei DE, Zhang Y, et al. CD73: an emerging checkpoint for cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy. 2019;11(11):983–97.
     Google Scholar
  76. Zhi X, Chen S, Zhou P, Shao Z, Wang L, Ou Z, et al. RNA interference of ecto-51-nucleotidase (CD73) inhibits human breast cancer cell growth and invasion. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2007;24(6):439–48.
     Google Scholar
  77. Wu R, Chen Y, Li F, Li W, Zhou H, Yang Y, et al. Effects ofCD73 on human colorectal cancer cell growth in vivo and in vitro. Oncol Rep. 2016;35(3):1750–6.
     Google Scholar
  78. Gao ZW, Wang HP, Lin F, Wang X, Long M, Zhang HZ, et al. Cd73 promotes proliferation and migration of human cervical cancer cells independent of its enzyme activity. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:135.
     Google Scholar
  79. Zhou L, Jia S, Chen Y, Wang W, Wu Z, YuW, et al. The distinct role of CD73 in the progression of pancreatic cancer. J Mol Med, (Berl). 2019;97(6):803–15.
     Google Scholar
  80. Ma XL, Shen MN, Hu B, Wang BL, Yang WJ, Lv LH, et al. CD73 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression and metastasis via activating PI3K/AKT signaling by inducing Rap1-mediated membrane localization of P110β and predicts poor prognosis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):37.
     Google Scholar
  81. Xu Z, Gu C, Yao X, Guo W, Wang H, Lin T, et al. CD73 promotes tumor metastasis by modulating RICS/RhoA signaling and EMT in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(3):202.
     Google Scholar
  82. Aoki M, Koga K, Miyazaki M, Hamasaki M, Koshikawa N, Oyama M, et al. CD73 complexes with emmprin to regulate MMP-2 production from co-cultured sarcoma cells and fibroblasts. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):912.
     Google Scholar
  83. Aoki M, Tsunoda T, Koga K, Nabeshima K, Hamasaki M. MMP-2 regulation of Emmprin on tumour cells and CD73 on fibroblasts during tumour-stromal interaction. Anticancer Res. 2023;43(8):3735–45.
     Google Scholar
  84. Folkman J, Shing Y. Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(16):10931–4.
     Google Scholar
  85. Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Holash J. Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nat. 2000;407(6801):242–8.
     Google Scholar
  86. Takahashi Y, Kitadai Y, Bucana CD, Cleary KR, Ellis LM. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, correlates with vascularity, metastasis, and proliferation of human colon cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55(18):3964–8.
     Google Scholar
  87. Inoue K, Ozeki Y, Suganuma T, Sugiura Y, Tanaka S. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Association with angiogenesis and tumor progression. Cancer. 1997;79(2):206–13.
     Google Scholar
  88. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(4):581–611.
     Google Scholar
  89. Tang Y.Nakada MT, Rafferty P, et al. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression byEMMPRINvia the PI3KAkt signaling pathway. Mol Cancer Res. 2006;4:371–7.
     Google Scholar
  90. Marieb EA, Jones AZ, Li R, Misra S, Ghatak S, Cao J, et al. EMMPRIN promotes anchorage-independent growth in human mammary carcinoma cells by stimulating hyaluronan production, Tumorigenic potential of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer. Cancer Res. 2000;64(4):1229–32; Zucker S, Hymowitz M, Rollo EE, et al. Tumorigenic potential of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1921–8.
     Google Scholar
  91. Zucker S, Hymowitz M, Rollo EE, et al. Tumorigenic potential of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1921–8.
     Google Scholar
  92. Bougatef F, Quemener C, Kellouche S, Naimi B, Podgorniak MP, Millot G, et al. EMMPRIN promotes angiogenesis through hypoxia-inducible factor-2 alpha mediated regulation of soluble VEGF isoforms and their receptor VEGFR-2. Blood. 2009;114(27):5547–56.
     Google Scholar
  93. Yang H, ZouW, Li Y, Chen B, Xin X. Bridge linkage role played by CD98hc of anti-tumor drug resistance and cancer metastasis on cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6(6):942–7.
     Google Scholar
  94. Misra SJ, Ghatak S, Zoltan-Jones A, Toole BP. Regulation of multidrug resistance in cancer cells by hyaluronan. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(28):25285–8.
     Google Scholar
  95. Wang SJ, Bourguignon LYW. Hyaluronan and the interaction between CD44 and epidermal growth factor receptor in oncogenic signaling and chemotherapy resistance in head and neck cancer. Archiv Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg. 2006;132(7):771–8.
     Google Scholar
  96. Qin Z, Dai L, Bratoeva M, Slomiany MG, Toole BP, Parsons C. Cooperative roles for emmprin and LYVE-1 in the regulation of chemoresistance for primary lymphoma. Leukemia. 2011;25(10):1598–609.
     Google Scholar
  97. Zhou S, Liao L, Chen C, Zeng W, Liu S, Su J, et al. CD147 mediates chemoresistance in breast cancer via ABCG2 by acting its cellular localization and dimerization. Cancer Lett. 2013;337(2):285–92.
     Google Scholar
  98. Hatanaka M, Higashi Y, Kawai K, Su J, Zeng W, Chen X, et al. CD147-targeted siRNA in A375 malignant melanoma cells induces the phosphorylation of EGFR and downregulates cdc25C and MEK phosphorylation. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(4):2424–8.
     Google Scholar
  99. Fu ZG, Wang L, Cui HY, Peng JL, Wang SJ, Geng JJ, et al. A novel small molecule compound targeting CD147 inhibits the motility and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(8):9429–47.
     Google Scholar
  100. Baba M, Inoue M, Itoh K, Nishizawa Y. Blocking CD147 induces cell death in cancer cells through impairment of glycolytic energy metabolism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;374(1):111–6.
     Google Scholar
  101. Walter M, Simanovich E, Brod V, Lahat N, Bitterman H, Rahat MA. An epitope specific novel anti-EMMPRIN polyclonal antibody inhibits tumor progression. Oncoimmunology. 2015;5(2):e1078056.
     Google Scholar
  102. Chen ZN,Mi L, Xu J, Song F, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, et al. Targeting radio immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma with iodine (131I) metuximab injection: clinical phase I/II trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(2):435–44.
     Google Scholar
  103. Sugyo A, Tsuji AB, Sudo H, Koizumi M, Ukai Y, Kurosawa G, et al. Efficacy evaluation of combination treatment using gemcitabine and radio immunotherapy with 90Y-labelled fully human anti-CD147 monoclonal antibody 059-053 in a BxPC-3 xenograft mouse model of refractory pancreatic cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):2979.
     Google Scholar
  104. Dean NR, Knowles JA, Helman EE, Aldridge JC, Carroll WR, Magnuson JS, et al. Anti-EMMPRIN antibody treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in an ex-vivo model. Anticancer Drugs. 2010;21(9):861–7.
     Google Scholar
  105. Wang Y, Yuan L, Yang XM, Wei D, Wang B, Sun XX, et al. A chimeric antibody targeting CD147 inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma cell motility via FAK-PI3K-Akt-Girdin signaling pathway. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015;32(1):39–53.
     Google Scholar
  106. Huhe M, Lou J, Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Shi Y, Wang B, et al. A novel antibody drug conjugate, HcHAb-DM1, has potent antitumor activity against human non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;513(4):1083–91.
     Google Scholar
  107. Fan XY, He D, Sheng CB, Wang B, Wang LJ, Wu XQ, et al. Therapeutic anti-CD147 antibody sensitizes cells to chemoradiotherapy via targeting pancreatic cancer stem cells.AmJ TranslRes. 2019;11(6):3543–54.
     Google Scholar
  108. Simanovich E, Bold V, Rahat MM, Drazdov E, Walter M, Shakya J, et al. Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis by EMMPRIN multiple antigenic peptide (MAP) vaccination is mediated by immune modulation. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(1):e1261778.
     Google Scholar
  109. Tseng HC, Xiong W, Badei S, Yang Y, Ma M, Liu T, et al. Efficacy of anti-CD147 chimeric antigen receptors targeting hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4810.
     Google Scholar
  110. Spinello I, Saulle E, Quaranta MT, Pasquini L, Pelosi E, Castelli G, et al. The small molecule compound AC-73 targeting CD147 inhibits leukemic cell proliferation, induces autophagy and increases the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Haematologica. 2019;104(5):973–85.
     Google Scholar
  111. Voss DM, Spina R, Carter DL, Lim KS, Jerry CJ, Barr EE. Disruption of the monocarboxylate transporter-4-basigin interaction inhibits the hypoxic response, proliferation, and tumor progression. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4292.
     Google Scholar
  112. Suzuki S, Ishikawa K. Combined inhibition of EMMPRIN and epidermal growth factor receptor prevents the growth and migration of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2014;44(3):912–7.
     Google Scholar