Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Dacryo Cysto-Rhinostomy: External Versus Endoscopic

Joumany Brahim Salem
Mohammed V University, Morocco
* Corresponding author
Mehdi Khamaily
Mohammed V University, Morocco
Imane Tarib
Mohammed V University, Morocco
Sidi Dahi
Mohammed V University, Morocco
Rachid Zarrouk
Mohammed V University, Morocco
Yassine Mouzari
Mohammed V University, Morocco
Fouad El Asri
Mohammed V University, Morocco
Karim Reda
Mohammed V University, Morocco
Abdelbarre Oubaaz
Mohammed V University, Morocco
DOI icon 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.6.523

Read Counter
1133

Downloads
526

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2020-10-18
Published 2020-11-13

Read counter = 1133 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a surgical procedure that restores communication between the tear sac and the adjacent nasal cavity. Our work consists of a comparative study of the results of external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX-DCR) versus endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR), whose rate of therapeutic failure by endoscopic route estimated at 20% against only 7% in the case of external surgery.

Keywords: Dacryocystitis; Dacryocystorhinostomy; Endoscopic; External

References

  1. Woog J. J. The incidence of symptomatic acquired lacrimal outflow obstruction among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976-2000 (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 105: 649‑66.
     Google Scholar
  2. Balloon Catheter Dilation and Nasolacrimal Intubation for Treatment of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Following a Failed Probing. Arch Ophthalmol. mai 2009; 127(5): 633‑9.
     Google Scholar
  3. 36-13.pdf [Internet]. [cité 18 oct 2020]. Disponible sur: http://scolarite.fmp-usmba.ac.ma/cdim/mediatheque/e_theses/36-13.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  4. Irfan D. To compare the success rate of External Dacryocystorhinostomy with and without Silicon Intubation in patients of nasolacrimal duct obstruction: 3.
     Google Scholar
  5. Sadiq SA, Ohrlich S, Jones NS, Downes RN. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy--medium term results. Br J Ophthalmol. déc 1997; 81(12): 1089‑92.
     Google Scholar
  6. www.unitheque.com. Les voies lacrymales [Internet]. Unithèque. [cité 18 oct 2020]. Disponible sur: https://www.unitheque.com/les-voies-lacrymales/sfo/elsevier-masson/Livre/6243.
     Google Scholar
  7. Boboridis KG, Bunce C, Rose GE. Outcome of external dacryocystorhinostomy combined with membranectomy of a distal canalicular obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. juin 2005; 139(6): 1051‑5.
     Google Scholar
  8. Janssen A. G., Mansour K., Bos J. J., Manoliu R. A., Castelijns J. A. Abscess of the Lacrimal Sac due to Chronic or Subacute Dacryocystitis: Treatment with Temporary Stent Placement in the Nasolacrimal Duct. Radiology. 1 avr 2000; 215(1): 300‑4.
     Google Scholar
  9. Winther J. Dacryocystorhinostomy A.M. Iliff A Long-Term Follow-Up. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1982; 60(4): 564‑7.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ahmed DMS. A Clinical Study of Chronic Dacryocystitis:105.
     Google Scholar
  11. Khan M. K. H., Hossain M. A., Hossain M. J., Al-Masud A., Rahman M. Z. Comparative Study of External and Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy for the Treatment of Chronic Dacryocystitis. J Armed Forces Med Coll Bangladesh. 2011; 7(2): 15‑7.
     Google Scholar
  12. Durvasula V. S. P., Gatland D. J. Endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy: long-term results and evolution of surgical technique. J Laryngol Otol. août 2004; 118(8): 628‑32.
     Google Scholar
  13. Karim R., Ghabrial R., Lynch T., Tang B. A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2011; 5: 979‑89.
     Google Scholar
  14. Tarbet K. J., Custer P. L. External dacryocystorhinostomy. Surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology. juill 1995; 102(7): 1065‑70.
     Google Scholar
  15. Gauba V. External versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in a specialized lacrimal surgery center. Saudi J Ophthalmol Off J Saudi Ophthalmol Soc. janv 2014; 28(1): 36‑9.
     Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton W. J., Mossman H. W., Boyd J. D. Hamilton, Boyd and Mossman’s human embryology: prenatal development of form and function. London; Basingstoke; [Baltimore: Macmillan Press ; Williams and Wilkins; 1978.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ben Simon G. J., Joseph J., Lee S., Schwarcz R. M., McCann J. D., Goldberg R. A. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology. août 2005;112(8):1463‑8.
     Google Scholar
  18. Su P.-Y. Comparison of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. mars 2018;8(1):19‑23.
     Google Scholar
  19. Ozer S., Ozer P. A. Endoscopic vs external dacryocystorhinostomy-comparison from the patients’ aspect. Int J Ophthalmol. 18 août 2014;7(4):689‑96.
     Google Scholar
  20. Huang Y.-M., Huang Y.-Y., Yang H.-Y., Tsai C-.C., Yu W.-K., Kao S.-C., et al. Conjunctival papilloma: Clinical features, outcome, and factors related to recurrence. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018;8(1):15‑8.
     Google Scholar
  21. Dave T. V., Mohammed F. A., Ali M. J., Naik M. N. Etiologic analysis of 100 anatomically failed dacryocystorhinostomies. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 28 juill 2016; 10: 1419‑22.
     Google Scholar
  22. Altin Ekin M., Karadeniz Ugurlu S., Aytogan H., Sahin Atik S. Failure in Revision Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Study of Surgical Technique and Etiology. J Craniofac Surg. févr 2020;31(1):193‑6.
     Google Scholar
  23. Zhou W., Zhou M., Li Z., Wang T. Endoscopic Intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy in forty-five patients. Chin Med J (Engl). oct 1996;109(10):747‑8.
     Google Scholar
  24. Saha R., Sinha A., Phukan J. P. Endoscopic versus external approach dacryocystorhinostomy: A comparative analysis. Niger Med J J Niger Med Assoc. 2013; 54(3): 165‑9.
     Google Scholar
  25. Rizvi S. A. R., Saquib M., Maheshwari R., Gupta Y., Iqbal Z., Maheshwari P. Cosmetic evaluation of surgical scars after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Int J Ophthalmol. 18 déc 2016; 9(12): 1745‑50.
     Google Scholar
  26. Lin G. C., Brook C. D., Hatton M. P., Metson R. Causes of dacryocystorhinostomy failure: External versus endoscopic approach. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 1 mai 2017; 31(3): 181‑5.
     Google Scholar
  27. Moras K., Bhat M. External Dacryocystorhinostomy Versus Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Comparison. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011; 5:5.
     Google Scholar
  28. Ho A., Sachidananda R., Carrie S., Neoh C. Quality of life assessment after non-laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol Off J ENT-UK Off J Neth Soc Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Cervico-Facial Surg. oct 2006; 31(5): 399‑403.
     Google Scholar
  29. Vinciguerra A, Nonis A, Resti AG, Bussi M, Trimarchi M. Impact of Post-Surgical Therapies on Endoscopic and External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. nov 2020; 34(6): 846‑56.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>