Research Article

Properties of Different Mortars and their Effect on the Flexural Strength of Low Density Block Walls

Ash Ahmed
Senior Lecturer in Materials Science School of the Built Environment & Engineering Leeds Beckett University Civic Quarter Northern Terrace Leeds LS2 8AG
* Corresponding author
Jhon Kamau
Civil Engineering Group. Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, England
DOI icon 10.24018/ejeng.2017.2.5.340

Read Counter
843

Downloads
796

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2017-05-04
Published 2017-05-18

Read counter = 843 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Mortar for masonry is important because it provides the linkage between masonry units so enabling the composite to behave as a single material.  The type of mortar used determines the flexural and compressive strength of the masonry so in this paper, a range of mortars are examined and their effects on the flexural strength of low density block walls determined.  These include traditional designation (iii) (1 cement : 1 lime : 6 sand), designation (iv) (1 cement : 1 lime : 9 sand) mortars as defined in BS 5628, and two thin layer mortars. The conventional mortars were formed using both 42.5N or 32.5N PC to BS EN 197 in order to ascertain the difference these two cements have on the properties of mortar. The thin layer mortars show remarkably high compressive strength. The characteristic flexural strength of low density aircrete wallettes incorporating both these conventional and thin layer mortars was verified. The wallettes were tested in accordance with British and European standards. The flexural strength of aircrete wallettes was derived from the strength of small specimens tested to destruction under four-point loading. The strengths of the wallettes are high with impressive repeatability with the maximum strength being reached for thin layer wallettes within 7 days curing time. In general the strengths of both conventional mortar and thin layer mortar wallettes compare favourably to values reported in the standards.
Keywords: Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Aircrete Flexural Strength Low Density Blockwork Mortar Thin Layer Mortar

References

  1. BS 5628-1:1992 – Code of practice for use of masonry – Part 1: Structural Use of Un-reinforced Masonry.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, A., Flexural strength of low density blockwork, International Conference on Construction Materials and Structures, ICCMATS 2014, Johannesburg, South Africa.
     Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, A., Fried, A., Roberts, J.J., Advantages and Implications of High Performance Low Density Aircrete Products for the UK Construction Industry, 13th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference (IBBMaC), Amsterdam, Netherlands 2004.
     Google Scholar
  4. H+H Celcon Ltd, www.hhcelcon.co.uk [accessed 24.1.17].
     Google Scholar
  5. The UK Aircrete Association, 2013, Code of Best Practice for the Use of AAC, www.aircrete.co.uk.
     Google Scholar
  6. Ahmed, A., Fried, A., Roberts, J.J., Advantages and Implications of High Performance Low Density Aircrete Products for the UK Construction Industry, 13th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference (IBBMaC), Amsterdam, Netherlands 2004.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bright, N., Ahmed, A., Concentrated Loads on Aircrete Thin Joint Blockwork, 14th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference (IBBMaC), Sydney, Australia 2008.
     Google Scholar
  8. Dubral, W., 1992, YTONG AG, Munich, Germany, Advances in Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, Wittmann (ed.) © Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5410 086 9.
     Google Scholar
  9. Mitsuda, T., and Kiribayashi, T., 1992, Hydrothermal properties of autoclaved aerated concrete, Advances in Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, Wittmann (ed.) © Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5410 086 9.
     Google Scholar
  10. Callister, W., Jr., 2011, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, The University of Utah, Materials Science and Engineering – An Introduction, Seventh Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, ISBN 9780471736967.
     Google Scholar
  11. Ungkoon et al, A study of hygrothermal performance of AAC blocks under humid climate of Thailand. International Conference “Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment”, Santorini, Greece 2005
     Google Scholar
  12. Thermalite, Hanson HeidelBerg Cement Group, www.heidelbergcement.com [accessed 18.3.17].
     Google Scholar
  13. Design for Homes, Application of Aircrete Blocks, www.designforhomes.org [accessed 8.2.17].
     Google Scholar
  14. Lippe, K., 1992, YTONG AG, R + D Centre, Schrobenhausen, Germany, The effect of moisture on the thermal conductivity of AAC, Advances in Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, Wittmann (ed.) © Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5410 086 9.
     Google Scholar
  15. Liu, C., and Wang, J., 1992, An experimental study on thermal transmission properties of AAC panels, Advances in Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, Wittmann (ed.) © Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5410 086 9.
     Google Scholar
  16. Tarmac Building products, AAC Blocks, www.tarmacbuildingproducts.co.uk [accessed 16.1.15].
     Google Scholar
  17. Quan, Y., Nianxiang, Y., Applications of AAC block in new energy-saving building structure, Electric Technology and Civil Engineering (ICETCE) Conference, 1066-1069, Lushan, China 2011.
     Google Scholar
  18. Yuplng, Z., Dedong, L., Guokuang, S., Investigation into the Carbonation of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, 8th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, 1996;5:93-98
     Google Scholar
  19. Wittman, F.H., 1993a, Autoclaved Aerated Concrete: Properties, Testing and Design, RILEM Recommended Practice, RILEM Technical Committees 78 – MCA and 51 – ALC.
     Google Scholar
  20. Tada, S., 1992, Texte, Inc. and Nihon University, Japan. Advances in AAC, Wittmann (ed.) © Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 905410 086 9.
     Google Scholar
  21. Jacobs, F., and Mayer, G., 1992, Institute for Building Materials, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, Advances in Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, Wittmann (ed.) © Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5410 086 9.
     Google Scholar
  22. Schober, G., Hebel AG, Emmering, 1992, Germany, Effect of size distribution of air pores in AAC on compressive strength, Advances in AAC, Wittmann (ed.) © Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 5410 086 9.
     Google Scholar
  23. BS EN 197; Part 1- Cement Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements.
     Google Scholar
  24. BS 1200:1976 – Specifications for Building Sands from Natural Resources.
     Google Scholar
  25. BS EN 1015-3:1999 – Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table).
     Google Scholar
  26. BS EN 998-2:2003 - Specification for mortar for masonry. Masonry mortar.
     Google Scholar
  27. BS EN 1015-11:1999 - Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry. Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar.
     Google Scholar
  28. British Standards b, BS EN 1052: Part 2: 1999 – Determination of Flexural Strength. Now incorporated into the Eurocode 6.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)