Research Article

Visualizing Semantic Structure of a Clinical Text Document

Jonah Kenei
University of Nairobi, Kenya
* Corresponding author
Elisha Opiyo
University of Nairobi, Kenya
Robert Oboko
University of Nairobi, Kenya
DOI icon 10.24018/ejece.2020.4.6.256

Read Counter
857

Downloads
570

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2020-11-19
Published 2020-12-04

Read counter = 857 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

The increasing use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in healthcare delivery settings has led to increase availability of electronic clinical data. They generate a lot of patients’ clinical data each day, requiring physicians to review them to find clinically relevant information of different patients during care episodes. The availability of electronically collected healthcare data has created the need of computational tools to analyze them. One of the types of data which doctors have access to is clinical notes that resides in electronic health records. These notes are useful as they provide comprehensive information about patients’ health histories with many practical uses. For example, doctors always review these notes during care episodes to appraise themselves about the health history of a patient. These reviews are currently manual where a doctor reads a patient’s chart while looking for specific clinical information. Without the proper support, this manual process leads to information overload and increases physician cognitive workload. Current electronic health records (EHRs) do not provide support to help physicians reduce cognitive workload when completing clinical tasks. This is especially true for long clinical documents which require quick review at the point of care. The growing amount of clinical documentation available in EHRs has arose the need of tools that support synthesize of information in EHRs. The use of visual analytics to explore healthcare data is one such research direction to address this problem. However, existing visualization techniques are mainly based on structured electronic health record and rarely support therapeutic activities. Therefore, visualization of unstructured clinical records to support clinical practice is required. In this paper we propose a unique approach for graphically representing and visualizing the semantic structure of a clinical text document to aid doctors in reviewing electronic clinical notes. A user evaluation demonstrates that the proposed method for visualizing and navigating a document’s semantic structure facilitates a user’s document information exploration.

Keywords: Semantics, visualization; Electronic health records

References

  1. Wang, Y., Tafti, A.P., Sohn, S., & Zhang, R. (2019). Applications of Natural Language Processing in Clinical Research and Practice. NAACL-HLT.
     Google Scholar
  2. Meystre, S., Savova, G., Kipper-schuler, K., & Hurdle, J. (2008). Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearbook of medical informatics, 128-44 .
     Google Scholar
  3. Laxmisan, A., McCoy, A. B., Wright, A., & Sittig, D. F. (2012). Clinical Summarization Capabilities of Commercially-available and Internally-developed Electronic Health Records. Applied Clinical Informatics, 3(1), pp. 80?93. http://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-11-RA-0066.
     Google Scholar
  4. Katal, A., Wazid, M., & Goudar, R.H. (2013). Big data: Issues, challenges, tools and Good practices. 2013 Sixth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), 404-409.
     Google Scholar
  5. Jonnalagadda, S. R., Del Fiol, G., Medlin, R., Weir, C., Fiszman, M., Mostafa, J., & Liu, H. (2013). Automatically extracting sentences from Medline citations to support clinicians' information needs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 20(5), 995?1000. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001347.
     Google Scholar
  6. Taylor, C., 2020. Structured Vs. Unstructured Data. [online] Datamation.com. Available at: <https://www.datamation.com/big-data/structured-vs-unstructured-data.html> [Accessed 2 August 2020].
     Google Scholar
  7. Sun, W., Cai, Z., Li, Y., Liu, F., Fang, S., & Wang, G. (2018). Data Processing and Text Mining Technologies on Electronic Medical Records: A Review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  8. Huang, K., Altosaar, J., & Ranganath, R. (2019). ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmission. ArXiv, abs/1904.05342.
     Google Scholar
  9. Barbulescu, M., Grigoriu, R., Halcu, I., Neculoiu, G., Sandulescu, V. C., Marinescu, M., & Marinescu, V. (2013). Integrating of structured, semi-structured and unstructured data in natural and build environmental engineering. In 2013 11th RoEduNet International Conference (pp. 1?4). IEEE. doi:10.1109/RoEduNet.2013.6511738.
     Google Scholar
  10. Farri, O., Pieczkiewicz, D.S., Rahman, A., Pakhomov, S.V., Adam, T., & Melton, G.B. (2012). A Qualitative Analysis of EHR Clinical Document Synthesis by Clinicians. AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012, 1211-20.
     Google Scholar
  11. Farri, O., Monsen, K.A., Pakhomov, S.V., Pieczkiewicz, D.S., Speedie, S.M., & Melton, G.B. (2013). Effects of time constraints on clinician-computer interaction: A study on information synthesis from EHR clinical notes. Journal of biomedical informatics, 46 6, 1136-44.
     Google Scholar
  12. Pollack, A.H., & Pratt, W. (2020). Association of Health Record Visualizations With Physicians? Cognitive Load When Prioritizing Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Network Open, 3.
     Google Scholar
  13. Farri, O. (2012). Understanding Clinician Information Demands and Synthesis of Clinical Documents in Electronic Health Record Systems.
     Google Scholar
  14. Bui, A.A., Aberle, D., & Kangarloo, H. (2007). TimeLine: Visualizing Integrated Patient Records. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 11, 462-473.
     Google Scholar
  15. Farri, O., Rahman, A., Monsen, K. A., Zhang, R., Pakhomov, S. V., Pieczkiewicz, D. S., ? Melton, G. B. (2012). Impact of of a Prototype Visualization Tool for New Information in EHR Clinical Documents. Applied Clinical Informatics, 3(4), 404?418. http://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2012-05-RA-0017.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ruan, W., Appasani, N., Kim, K., Vincelli, J., Kim, H., & Lee, W. (2018). Pictorial Visualization of EMR Summary Interface and Medical Information Extraction of Clinical Notes. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA), 1-6.
     Google Scholar
  17. Deng, Y., & Denecke, K. (2014). Visualizing Unstructured Patient Data for Assessing Diagnostic and Therapeutic History. Studies in health technology and informatics, 205, 1158-1162.
     Google Scholar
  18. Ledesma, A., Bidargaddi, N., Strobel, J.E., Schrader, G., Nieminen, H., Korhonen, I., & Ermes, M. (2019). Health timeline: an insight-based study of a timeline visualization of clinical data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19(170).
     Google Scholar
  19. Bui, A., Aberle, D.R., Kangarloo, H., (2007). TimeLine: Visualizing Integrated Patient Records. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 11(4), pp.462-473.
     Google Scholar
  20. Interactive Visualization and Exploration of Patient Progression in a Hospital Setting.
     Google Scholar
  21. Dornan, L., Pinyopornpanish, K., Jiraporncharoen, W., Hashmi, A.H., Dejkriengkraikul, N., & Angkurawaranon, C. (2019). Utilisation of Electronic Health Records for Public Health in Asia: A Review of Success Factors and Potential Challenges. BioMed Research International, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  22. Boonstra, A., Versluis, A., & Vos, J.F. (2014). Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 14.
     Google Scholar
  23. Wolfe, L., Chisolm, M.S., & Bohsali, F. (2018). Clinically Excellent Use of the Electronic Health Record: Review. JMIR Human Factors, 5.
     Google Scholar
  24. Pivovarov, R., & Elhadad, N. (2015). Automated methods for the summarization of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 22(5), 938?947. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv032.
     Google Scholar
  25. Schopf, T.R., Nedreb?, B., Hufthammer, K.O., Daphu, I.K., & L?rum, H. (2019). How well is the electronic health record supporting the clinical tasks of hospital physicians? A survey of physicians at three Norwegian hospitals. BMC Health Services Research, 19.
     Google Scholar
  26. Menachemi, N., & Collum, T.H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47 - 55.
     Google Scholar
  27. Bates, D.W., Teich, J.M., Lee, J., Seger, D.L., Kuperman, G.J., Ma'Luf, N., Boyle, D., & Leape, L. (1999). Research Paper: The Impact of Computerized Physician Order Entry on Medication Error Prevention. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 6 4, 313-21.
     Google Scholar
  28. Bates, D.W., Leape, L., Cullen, D.J., Laird, N., Petersen, L.A., Teich, J.M., Burdick, E., Hickey, M., Kleefield, S., Shea, B., Vliet, M.V., & Seger, D.L. (1998). Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA, 280 15, 1311-6.
     Google Scholar
  29. HealthIT. ?Improved Diagnostics & Patient Outcomes.? HealthIT.gov. http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/improved-diagnostics-patient-outcomes. Updated June 2019. Accessed May 2020.
     Google Scholar
  30. Landi, I., Glicksberg, B., Lee, H., Cherng, S.T., Landi, G., Danieletto, M., Dudley, J., Furlanello, C., & Miotto, R. (2020). Deep representation learning of electronic health records to unlock patient stratification at scale. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3.
     Google Scholar
  31. Koopman, R.J., Steege, L.M., Moore, J.L., Clarke, M.A., Canfield, S.M., Kim, M.S., & Belden, J.L. (2015). Physician Information Needs and Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Time to Reengineer the Clinic Note. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 28 3, 316-23.
     Google Scholar
  32. Mujjiga, S., Krishna, V., Chakravarthi, K., & Vijayananda, J. (2019). Identifying Semantics in Clinical Reports Using Neural Machine Translation. AAAI.
     Google Scholar
  33. Reis, J.C., Bonacin, R., & Perciani, E.M. (2016). Intention-Based Information Retrieval of Electronic Health Records. 2016 IEEE 25th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), 217-222.
     Google Scholar
  34. Hultman, G.M., Marquard, J.L., Lindemann, E., Arsoniadis, E.G., Pakhomov, S.V., & Melton, G.B. (2019). Challenges and Opportunities to Improve the Clinician Experience Reviewing Electronic Progress Notes. Applied clinical informatics, 10 3, 446-453.
     Google Scholar
  35. Reichert, D., Kaufman, D., Bloxham, B., Chase, H., & Elhadad, N. (2010). Cognitive analysis of the summarization of longitudinal patient records. AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2010, 667?671.
     Google Scholar
  36. Nordo, A.H., Levaux, H.P., Becnel, L.B., G?lvez, J., Rao, P.K., Stem, K., Prakash, E., & Kush, R.D. (2019). Use of EHRs data for clinical research: Historical progress and current applications. Learning Health Systems, 3.
     Google Scholar
  37. Juhn, Y.J., & Liu, H. (2019). Natural language processing to advance EHR-based clinical research in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.
     Google Scholar
  38. Meystre, S.M., Lovis, C., B?rkle, T., Tognola, G., Budrionis, A., & Lehmann, C.U. (2017). Clinical Data Reuse or Secondary Use: Current Status and Potential Future Progress. Yearbook of medical informatics, 26 1, 38-52.
     Google Scholar
  39. Beresniak, A., Schmidt, A., Proeve, J., Bola?os, E., Patel, N., Ammour, N., Sundgren, M., Ericson, M., Karakoyun, T., Coorevits, P.L., Kalra, D., Moor, G.J., & Dupont, D. (2016). Cost-benefit assessment of using electronic health records data for clinical research versus current practices: Contribution of the Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) European Project. Contemporary clinical trials, 46, 85-91.
     Google Scholar
  40. Arbabi, A., Adams, D.R., Fidler, S., & Brudno, M. (2019). Identifying Clinical Terms in Medical Text Using Ontology-Guided Machine Learning. JMIR Medical Informatics, 7.
     Google Scholar
  41. Hultman, G.M., Marquard, J.L., Lindemann, E., Arsoniadis, E.G., Pakhomov, S.V., & Melton, G.B. (2019). Challenges and Opportunities to Improve the Clinician Experience Reviewing Electronic Progress Notes. Applied clinical informatics, 10 3, 446-453.
     Google Scholar
  42. Su, Y., Chao, C., Hung, L., Sung, S., & Lee, P. (2020). A Natural Language Processing Approach to Automated Highlighting of New Information in Clinical Notes. Applied Sciences, 10, 2824.
     Google Scholar
  43. Clarke, M.A., Belden, J.L., Koopman, R.J., Steege, L.M., Moore, J.L., Canfield, S.M., & Kim, M.S. (2013). Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: a literature review. Health information and libraries journal, 30(3), 178-190.
     Google Scholar
  44. McEnery, K. W. 2018. Reference Guide in Information
     Google Scholar
  45. Technology for the Practicing Radiologist. American College of Radiology.
     Google Scholar
  46. Ajami S, Bagheri-Tadi T. Barriers for adopting electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians. Acta Informatica Medica 2013;21:129. pmid:24058254
     Google Scholar
  47. View ArticlePubMed/NCBIGoogle Scholar.
     Google Scholar
  48. Roman, L.C., Ancker, J., Johnson, S., & Senathirajah, Y. (2017). Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature. Journal of biomedical informatics, 67, 69-79.
     Google Scholar
  49. Reisman, M. (2017). EHRs: The Challenge of Making Electronic Data Usable and Interoperable. P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 42 9, 572-575.
     Google Scholar
  50. Jensen, P., Jensen, L. & Brunak, S. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat Rev Genet 13, 395?405 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3208.
     Google Scholar
  51. Ben-Assuli, O., Ziv, A., Sagi, D., Leshno, M., & Ironi, A. (2014). Improving Diagnostic Accuracy Using EHR in Emergency Departments: A Simulation-Based Study. Journal of biomedical informatics, 55, 31-40.
     Google Scholar
  52. Aleksi, D.S., Rajkovi, P., Vukovi, D., Jankovi, D., & Milenkovi, A. (2017). Data summarization method for chronic disease tracking. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 69, 188-202.
     Google Scholar
  53. Samal, L., Wright, A., Wong, B., Linder, J., & Bates, D. (2011). Leveraging electronic health records to support chronic disease management: the need for temporal data views. Informatics in primary care, 19 2, 65-74.
     Google Scholar
  54. Lesselroth, B.J., & Pieczkiewicz, D.S. (2011). Data Visualization Strategies for the Electronic Health Record.
     Google Scholar
  55. Ledesma, A., Bidargaddi, N., Strobel, J., Schrader, G., Nieminen, H., Korhonen, I., & Ermes, M. (2019). Health timeline: an insight-based study of a timeline visualization of clinical data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19.
     Google Scholar
  56. West, V., Borland, D. and Hammond, W. (2014). Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.
     Google Scholar
  57. Roque, F., Slaughter, L.A., & Tkatsenko, A. (2010). A Comparison of Several Key Information Visualization Systems for Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Content. In: Proceedings of NAACL HLT Workshop on Text and Data Mining of Health Documents, pp.1?8.
     Google Scholar
  58. Rind, A., Wang, T. D., Aigner, W., Miksh, S., Wongsuphasawat, K., Plaisant, C., and Shneiderman, B (2013). Interactive Information Visualization to Explore and Query Electronic Health Records. Foundations and Trends in Human?Computer Interaction, 5(3), pp.207-298.
     Google Scholar
  59. Sultanum, N., Singh, D.A., Brudno, M., & Chevalier, F. (2018). Doccurate: A Curation-Based Approach for Clinical Text Visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics.
     Google Scholar
  60. Trivedi, G., Pham, P., Chapman, W.W., Hwa, R., Wiebe, J., & Hochheiser, H. (2018). NLPReViz: an interactive tool for natural language processing on clinical text. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 25(1), pp. 81-87.
     Google Scholar
  61. Yerebakan, H.Z., Shinagawa, Y., Bhatia, P.S., & Zhan, Y. (2018). Document Representation Learning for Patient History Visualization. COLING.
     Google Scholar
  62. West, V. L., Borland, D., & Hammond, W. E. (2015). Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 22(2), pp. 330?339. http://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002955.
     Google Scholar
  63. Plaisant, C., Mushlin, R., Snyder, A., Li, J., Heller, D., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records. Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 76-80.
     Google Scholar
  64. Wang, T.D., Plaisant, C., Quinn, A.J., Stanchak, R., Murphy, S., & Shneiderman, B. (2008). Aligning temporal data by sentinel events: discovering patterns in electronic health records. CHI.
     Google Scholar
  65. Zhang, Z., Ahmed, F., Mittal, A., Zhao, R., Viccellio, A., & Mueller, K. (2011). AnamneVis: A Framework for the Visualization of Patient History and Medical Diagnostics Chains.
     Google Scholar
  66. Plaisant, C., Milash, B., Rose, A., Widoff, S., & Shneiderman, B. (1996). LifeLines: visualizing personal histories. CHI '96.
     Google Scholar
  67. West, V. L., Borland, D., & Hammond, W. E. (2015). Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 22(2), 330?339. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002955.
     Google Scholar
  68. Plaisant, C., Mushlin, R., Snyder, A., Li, J., Heller, D., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records. Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 76-80.
     Google Scholar
  69. Plaisant, C., Milash, B., Rose, A., Widoff, S., & Shneiderman, B. (1996). LifeLines: visualizing personal histories. CHI '96.
     Google Scholar
  70. Martins, S.B., Shahar, Y., Goren-Bar, D., Galperin-Aizenberg, M., Kaizer, H., Basso, L., McNaughton, D., & Goldstein, M. (2008). Evaluation of an architecture for intelligent query and exploration of time-oriented clinical data. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 43 1, 17-34.
     Google Scholar
  71. Klimov, D., Shahar, Y., & Taieb-Maimon, M. (2010). Intelligent visualization and exploration of time-oriented data of multiple patients. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 49 1, 11-31.
     Google Scholar
  72. Klimov, D., Shahar, Y., & Taieb-Maimon, M. (2009). Intelligent interactive visual exploration of temporal associations among multiple time-oriented patient records. Methods of information in medicine, 48 3, 254-62.
     Google Scholar
  73. Ola, O., & Sedig, K. (2016). Beyond simple charts: Design of visualizations for big health data. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 8.
     Google Scholar
  74. Sahu, M., & Maringanti, H.B. (2016). Cognitive Architectural Model for Solving Clustering Problem. FICTA.
     Google Scholar
  75. Andrus, M.R., Mcdonough, S.K., Kelley, K., Stamm, P.L., McCoy, E., Lisenby, K.M., Whitley, H., Slater, N.A., Carroll, D., Hester, E., Helmer, A., Jackson, C.W., & Byrd, D. (2018). Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82.
     Google Scholar
  76. Lisenby, K.M., Andrus, M.R., Jackson, C.W., Stevenson, T., Fan, S., Gaillard, P., & Carroll, D. (2018). Ambulatory care preceptors' perceptions on SOAP note writing in advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning, 10 12, 1574-1578.
     Google Scholar
  77. [4] Cresswell, S. (2016, October 13). Understanding SOAP format for Clinical Rounds. Retrieved from https://www.gapmedics.com/blog/2015/01/02/understanding-soap-format-for-clinical-rounds/.
     Google Scholar
  78. Mowery, D., Wiebe, J., Visweswaran, S., Harkema, H., & Chapman, W. (2012). Building an automated SOAP classifier for emergency department reports. Journal of biomedical informatics, 45 1, 71-81.
     Google Scholar
  79. March, S. T. and Smith, G. F. (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology, in Decision Support Systems, 15(4): 251-266.
     Google Scholar
  80. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. (2004) Design science in information systems research. In MIS Quarterly 28 (1):75-105.
     Google Scholar
  81. Norman, K.L. & Schneiderman, B. (2017) QUIS: Questionnaire for UserInteraction Satisfaction. Vol. 2017 University of Maryland.
     Google Scholar
  82. Marghescu, D., & Rajanen, M. (2004). Evaluating the Quality of Use of Visual Data-Mining Tools.
     Google Scholar
  83. Lewis, J.R. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Human?Computer Interaction, 34, 577 - 590.
     Google Scholar
  84. Brooke, J. (1996) SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation inindustry, 189(194), 4-7.
     Google Scholar
  85. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. & Miller, J. (2009) Determining what individual SUSscores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Studies, 4(3),114-123.
     Google Scholar
  86. Brooke, J. (2013) SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Studies, 8(2), 29-40.
     Google Scholar