Research Article

Brief Overview About Project Management

Fnu Konika
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejbmr.2016.1.1.6

Read Counter
1574

Downloads
475

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2016-11-29
Published 2016-12-30

Read counter = 1574 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

This paper tells that how project management works with all the resources which is needed in doing any project. Resources are very essential part of project management. A comprehensive literature says about the project management what methods should be done in doing any project. There are different methods for doing any project for example building properties and commercials have their own method. The model highlights that what are the requirements are needed to do any project and how project can be done. This covers all the factors on which project management is dependent. The project management depends on various sources in which they all have different role. Every source is required to manage a project. The model is used for the projects to make them better and understanding projects. In this various things about ding a project is mentioned. The paper shows how project management depend on other variables and how projects are managed by other independent variable.

Keywords: Project Management Resource Management Scope Management Time Management Money Management

References

  1. Butler, A.G., Project Management: A Study in Organizational Conflict. The Academy of Management Journal, 1973. 16(1): p. 84-101.
     Google Scholar
  2. Goodman, R.A., Ambiguous Authority Definition in Project Management. The Academy of Management Journal, 1967. 10(4): p. 395-407.
     Google Scholar
  3. Wilkes, J., Project Management Software. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1987. 38(2): p. 209-209.
     Google Scholar
  4. Felix, R.G. and W.L. Harrison, Project Management Considerations for Distributed Processing Applications. MIS Quarterly, 1984. 8(3): p. 161-170.
     Google Scholar
  5. Meinhart, W.A. and L.M. Delionback, Project Management: An Incentive Contracting Decision Model. The Academy of Management Journal, 1968. 11(4): p. 427-434.
     Google Scholar
  6. Smith, D.K., Project Management Software. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1986. 37(12): p. 1203-1204.
     Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, M.W., et al., Product Development Tensions: Exploring Contrasting Styles of Project Management. The Academy of Management Journal, 2002. 45(3): p. 546-564.
     Google Scholar
  8. Liberatore, M.J. and G.J. Titus, The Practice of Management Science in R&D Project Management. Management Science, 1983. 29(8): p. 962-974.
     Google Scholar
  9. Committee on Management of Real Estate, R.P.D., MODEL APARTMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal, 1979. 14(2): p. 401-409.
     Google Scholar
  10. Davis, J., A. MacDonald, and L. White, Problem-structuring methods and project management: an example of stakeholder involvement using Hierarchical Process Modelling methodology. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2010. 61(6): p. 893-904.
     Google Scholar
  11. Arbaugh, J.B., Introduction: Project Management Education: Emerging Tools, Techniques, and Topics. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2007. 6(4): p. 568-569.
     Google Scholar
  12. Irani, Z., Investment evaluation within project management. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kolisch, R., Resource Allocation Capabilities of Commercial. Project Management Software Packages, 1999
     Google Scholar
  14. Lyden, F.J., Project Management: Beyond Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 1970
     Google Scholar
  15. Mathur, G., Introduction to Project Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2007
     Google Scholar
  16. Lee, L.S., & Anderson, Rita M., An Exploratory Investigation of the Antecedents of the IT Project Management Capability. e-Service Journal, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  17. Gates, D.H., Social Welfare and Integrated Resource Management. Journal of Range Management, 1972. 25(6): p. 411-412.
     Google Scholar
  18. Rue, R., Evaluation Of Resource Management: Costly But Probably Worthwhile. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 1991. 302(6788): p. 1291-1292.
     Google Scholar
  19. Coppock, J.T., Research in Resource Management: A Joint SSRC/RGS/IBG Seminar. The Geographical Journal, 1972. 138(4): p. 466-469.
     Google Scholar
  20. Twyman, C., Rethinking Community Resource Management: Managing Resources or Managing People in Western Botswana? Third World Quarterly, 1998. 19(4): p. 745-770.
     Google Scholar
  21. Bradbeer, J., Resource Management. Area, 1980. 12(1): p. 85-85.
     Google Scholar
  22. Twyman, C., Participatory Conservation? Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Botswana. The Geographical Journal, 2000. 166(4): p. 323-335.
     Google Scholar
  23. Clark, K.B., Project Scope and Project Performance: The Effect of Parts Strategy and Supplier Involvement on Product Development. Management Science, 1989. 35(10): p. 1247-1263.
     Google Scholar
  24. Jernel, et al., Evaluation of the Role and Distribution of Mercuty in Ecosystems with Special Emphasis on Tropical Regions. A SCOPE Project. Ambio, 1995. 24(5): p. 319-320.
     Google Scholar
  25. Roider, A., Delegation, Risk, and Project Scope. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 2009. 165(2): p. 193-209.
     Google Scholar
  26. Rosswall, T., SCOPE Moves Ahead. Ambio, 1979. 8(5): p. 236-237.
     Google Scholar
  27. Alpert, P., J. Lubchenco, and P.G. Risser, The Sustainable Biosphere Project of SCOPE. Ambio, 1995. 24(2): p. 133-134.
     Google Scholar
  28. Hintikka, J., No Scope for Scope? Linguistics and Philosophy, 1997. 20(5): p. 515-544.
     Google Scholar
  29. Partin, R., Time Management. American Secondary Education, 1982. 12(2): p. 4-6.
     Google Scholar
  30. Trueman, M. and J. Hartley, A Comparison between the Time-Management Skills and Academic Performance of Mature and Traditional-Entry University Students. Higher Education, 1996. 32(2): p. 199-215.
     Google Scholar
  31. McIntyre, D.J. and W.R. Morris, Time Management and Instructional Supervision. The Clearing House, 1982. 55(9): p. 422-424.
     Google Scholar
  32. Wedman, J., Time Management and Instructional Supervision. The Clearing House, 1982. 55(7): p. 297-299.
     Google Scholar
  33. Borovits, I. and E. Segev, Real-Time Management - An Analogy. The Academy of Management Review, 1977. 2(2): p. 311-316.
     Google Scholar
  34. Rosen, L.S., Tick, Tick, Time Management. Family Advocate, 2006. 29(1): p. 42-43.
     Google Scholar
  35. Lakonishok, J., et al., The Structure and Performance of the Money Management Industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1992. 1992: p. 339-391.
     Google Scholar
  36. Gover, D.A., Money Management: Some Implications for Teaching. Journal of Marriage and Family, 1964. 26(2): p. 231-233.
     Google Scholar
  37. Orr, G.J., Money Management in Life Situations. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1977. 12(1): p. 65-66.
     Google Scholar
  38. Koshland, D.E., The Perfect Money Management System. Science, 1988. 240(4849): p. 125-125.
     Google Scholar
  39. William, J.C. and B. Edward, A Taxonomy of Money Management. Financial Analysts Journal, 1974. 30(3): p. 24-23.
     Google Scholar
  40. Davies, D.K., S.E. Stock, and M.L. Wehmeyer, Utilization of Computer Technology to Facilitate Money Management by Individuals with Mental Retardation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 2003. 38(1): p. 106-112.
     Google Scholar
  41. Hall, M. and R. Holt, U.K. Public Sector Project Management: A Cultural Perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 2002. 25(3): p. 298-312.
     Google Scholar
  42. Barki, H., S. Rivard, and J. Talbot, An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001. 17(4): p. 37-69.
     Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, S.B., Three Approaches to Big Technology: Operations Research, Systems Engineering, and Project Management. Technology and Culture, 1997. 38(4): p. 891-919.
     Google Scholar